HQLO

official impact factor 1.86

Open Access Research

Determinants of agreement between self-reported and parent-assessed quality of life for children in Germany-results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)

Ute Ellert1*, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer2, Michael Erhart2 and Bärbel-Maria Kurth1

  • * Corresponding author: Ute Ellert ellertu@rki.de

  • † Equal contributors

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Health Reporting, Robert Koch Institute, Seestr. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany

2 Child Public Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2011, 9:102 doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-102

Published: 23 November 2011

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to quantify the level of agreement between self-reporting and proxy-assessment of children's health-related quality of life using KINDL-R in a large population based study in Germany and to identify factors which are associated with agreement.

Methods

The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents included the KINDL-R questionnaire on health-related quality of life. 6388 children and adolescents filled in the questionnaire while their parents answered the proxy version. Means and standard deviation for the self- and proxy ratings, and also the Pearson und Intra-Class correlation coefficients for the absolute agreement were calculated. The relationship between other variables and parent-child agreement were determined by means of logistic regression.

Results

In the 'Physical', 'Self-esteem' and 'School' dimension and for the 'Total' score, the parents significantly overestimated the quality of life of their child. In contrast, the quality of life of the children in the dimensions 'Psychological well-being' and 'Family' were considerably underestimated by the parents. The proportion of parent-child ratings in agreement (difference < 0.5 standard deviations) ranges from 34.9% for the 'Self-esteem' scale to 51.9% in the 'Psychological' scale. The most important factor explaining parents rating was the level of the child's self-assessment followed by the parent's assessment of the subjective health, or reported emotional abnormalities.

Conclusions

Our study shows that parental reports cannot adequately replace self-assessment for 11-17 year olds. In view of the different underlying perspectives, the parental assessments should where possible only be regarded as providing supplementary information.