Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchValidation of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) in primary careBjörn Ställberg1 , Mika Nokela2,3 , Per-Olof Ehrs4 , Paul Hjemdal3 and Eva Wikström Jonsson2,3  1
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2
Centre for Allergy Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden 3
Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital (Solna), SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden 4
Lung and Allergy Research, Division of Physiology, National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden author email corresponding author email
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2009,
7:26doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-26 Abstract
Background
Patient centred outcomes, such as health status, are important in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Extensive questionnaires on health status have good measurement properties, but are not suitable for use in primary care. The newly developed, short Clinical COPD Questionnaire, CCQ, was therefore validated against the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
Methods
111 patients diagnosed by general practitioners as having COPD completed the questionnaires twice, 2–3 months apart, without systematic changes in treatment. Within this sample of patients with "clinical COPD" a subgroup of patients with spirometry verified COPD was identified. All analyses was performed on both groups.
Results
The mean FEV1 (% predicted) was 58.1% for all patients with clinical COPD and 52.4% in the group with verified COPD (n = 83). Overall correlations between SGRQ and CCQ were strong for all patients with clinical COPD (0.84) and the verified COPD subgroup (0.82). The concordance intra-class correlation between SGRQ and CCQ was 0.91 (p < 0.05). Correlations between CCQ and SGRQ were moderate to good, regardless of COPD severity.
Conclusion
The CCQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessments of health status on the group level in patients treated for COPD in primary care but its reliability may not be sufficient for the monitoring of individual patients. |