Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchSimple imputation methods were inadequate for missing not at random (MNAR) quality of life dataShona Fielding1 , Peter M Fayers1,2 , Alison McDonald3 , Gladys McPherson3 and Marion K Campbell3 for the RECORD study group 1
Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, UK 2
Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway 3
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK author email corresponding author email
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2008,
6:57doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-57 Abstract
Objective
QoL data were routinely collected in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), which employed a reminder system, retrieving about 50% of data originally missing. The objective was to use this unique feature to evaluate possible missingness mechanisms and to assess the accuracy of simple imputation methods.
Methods
Those patients responding after reminder were regarded as providing missing responses. A hypothesis test and a logistic regression approach were used to evaluate the missingness mechanism. Simple imputation procedures were carried out on these missing scores and the results compared to the actual observed scores.
Results
The hypothesis test and logistic regression approaches suggested the reminder data were missing not at random (MNAR). Reminder-response data showed that simple imputation procedures utilising information collected close to the point of imputation (last value carried forward, next value carried backward and last-and-next), were the best methods in this setting. However, although these methods were the best of the simple imputation procedures considered, they were not sufficiently accurate to be confident of obtaining unbiased results under imputation.
Conclusion
The use of the reminder data enabled the conclusion of possible MNAR data. Evaluating this mechanism was important in determining if imputation was useful. Simple imputation was shown to be inadequate if MNAR are likely and alternative strategies should be considered. |